rabbit.reviewsHow strongly 6 sources agree — expert labs and real owners, with community voices weighted heavier. Not one reviewer’s opinion; the pattern across all of them.
- Lightweight at 1 lb 6.6 oz for the pair without sacrificing performance
- Gore-Tex waterproofing keeps feet dry on muddy trails and shallow crossings
- Contagrip outsole with chevron-shaped lugs grips reliably on mud, wet boulders, and scree
- Felt tight around forefoot and midfoot out of the box, requiring break-in
- Quicklace system makes it difficult to achieve snug fit throughout the foot
- EVA midsole is not ultra-plush, firm rather than soft underfoot
“I've had good luck with the X Ultra 5s on similar terrain - the Contagrip outsole seems more durable than what they used on the XT-6. The 360s are solid too but I'd lean toward the 5s for better longevity based on what you're describing.”r/walking
Hikers who've logged serious miles in the X Ultra line consistently return to it, one Camino pilgrim noted “there's a reason that you see tons of them out on the trail,” pointing to a track record that goes beyond marketing. Those comparing it directly against older Salomon models found the Contagrip outsole “more durable than what they used on the XT-6,” addressing a known weak point from previous generations. New owners have reported being “extremely surprised on how light they are compared to their looks,” a common first-impression that holds up across varied terrain. The one honest caveat the community flags is the Gore-Tex version's breathability in hot climates, as one Southern US hiker put it, “your feet will be soaked on a summer hike in Gore Tex, not from water crossings, but from sweat.”