rabbit.reviews78Consensus score
How strongly 3 sources agree — expert labs and real owners, with community voices weighted heavier. Not one reviewer’s opinion; the pattern across all of them.
Buy it if
- Under 2 lbs (1 lb 13.7 oz) with Dyneema fabric that's fully waterproof and tear-resistant
- Rated to carry loads up to 40 lbs, far more than most ultralight packs (typically 30-35 lbs)
- Removable aluminum stays, foam back panel, and wide supportive hip belt for load transfer
Skip it if
- Expensive at $399, nearly twice the cost of the REI Flash 55
- Minimal organization: lidless design with streamlined storage may shock traditional backpackers
- Dyneema back panel offers poor ventilation, gets sweaty in hot climates
“Most cheap packs lack a proper suspension and won't be able to carry an even moderate load comfortably. And all are poorly constructed and risk critical failure (like broken straps) under normal use conditions.”r/CampingandHiking
What owners love
- Under 2 lbs (1 lb 13.7 oz) with Dyneema fabric that's fully waterproof and tear-resistant
- Rated to carry loads up to 40 lbs, far more than most ultralight packs (typically 30-35 lbs)
- Removable aluminum stays, foam back panel, and wide supportive hip belt for load transfer
- Available in 40L, 55L, and 70L capacities
The recurring gripe
- Expensive at $399, nearly twice the cost of the REI Flash 55